Random musings, complaints, comments about the idiosyncracies of human behavior.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Friday, February 09, 2007
Funny Voices In My Head
Disclaimer: Not a Psychotic Rant (despite the title)
I've been working with a lot of legal documents lately in my current job, and when I read over the language, I can't help but hear the voice of Mayor Quimby from the Simpsons in my head.
"Know all men by these presents, that such and such (hereinafter called the Principal), and so and so (hereinafter called the Surety), are held and firmly bound unto whosamacallit (hereinafter called the Obligee), in the full and just sum of one bajillion dolloars, the payment of which sum, well and truly made, the said Principal and Surety bind themselves, and each of their heirs, administrators, executors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
It's chowda, darn you."
I've been working with a lot of legal documents lately in my current job, and when I read over the language, I can't help but hear the voice of Mayor Quimby from the Simpsons in my head.
"Know all men by these presents, that such and such (hereinafter called the Principal), and so and so (hereinafter called the Surety), are held and firmly bound unto whosamacallit (hereinafter called the Obligee), in the full and just sum of one bajillion dolloars, the payment of which sum, well and truly made, the said Principal and Surety bind themselves, and each of their heirs, administrators, executors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
It's chowda, darn you."
Monday, February 05, 2007
According to The Quick and Dirty Career Test, these are the things I should be doing with my life:
Hmm.. about half of those look appealing. Maybe slightly more.
I didn't realize "Philosopher" was an occupation, though. Can you actually make money at that?
Your Career Personality: Independent, Insightful, and Ingenious |
![]() Your Ideal Careers: Architect Artist Business strategist College professor Computer programmer Mathematician Neurologist Philosopher Photographer Video game developer |
Hmm.. about half of those look appealing. Maybe slightly more.
I didn't realize "Philosopher" was an occupation, though. Can you actually make money at that?
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Life is like a Parking Lot
I read this in someone’s profile on OkCupid today:
“I understand now that you will always be alone in life. That your journey is just that- yours. Sometimes we are lucky enough to find that special person who will walk with us for a while and experience the same things and open up new paths... yet, life is solitary and I'm beginning to think the people that come into it- are fleeting... and WONDERful while they're there.
I wish someone would want to walk with me a little longer. “
It’s something that resonated with me, because it’s something that my bitter and jaded self has believed for a long time now. I really like the way she expressed it, but I would only add this:
The problem with finding someone to walk with is that most people seem to find it more convenient to drive around for ages in order to find a good parking spot than to hoof it that extra mile. Then, once they've found that spot, they seem generally loath to give it up because its convenient.
Don’t know if it’s laziness or something else, but that’s as apt a metaphor for the way people have relationships as any I can think of.
Maybe this is why I don't drive these days.
“I understand now that you will always be alone in life. That your journey is just that- yours. Sometimes we are lucky enough to find that special person who will walk with us for a while and experience the same things and open up new paths... yet, life is solitary and I'm beginning to think the people that come into it- are fleeting... and WONDERful while they're there.
I wish someone would want to walk with me a little longer. “
It’s something that resonated with me, because it’s something that my bitter and jaded self has believed for a long time now. I really like the way she expressed it, but I would only add this:
The problem with finding someone to walk with is that most people seem to find it more convenient to drive around for ages in order to find a good parking spot than to hoof it that extra mile. Then, once they've found that spot, they seem generally loath to give it up because its convenient.
Don’t know if it’s laziness or something else, but that’s as apt a metaphor for the way people have relationships as any I can think of.
Maybe this is why I don't drive these days.
Monday, January 29, 2007
Research
Warning: This one's going to be a long one.
This morning, a friend of mine forwarded me an email that he had received:
Editorial here by me: I snipped the list of senators because it just takes up too much space, and is pretty irrelevant to the point of this blog. I will note, however, that the senators listed are almost entirely Democrats, which does tie into the point of this blog somewhat.
In any event, the prominence of all the Democratic senators led me to the immediate assumption that this was some sort of partisan rant by some Republican emailer (probably not even a pol, but just some shmoe at home wanting to stir things up by mass e-mailing everyone he could.)
Now, I was never terribly politically minded until 9/11, like, I imagine, many people in the country. Never even voted until after that (or registered to vote!) Since then, I've found myself somewhat interested in politics and the political process, and I'll freely admit to being rather a liberal (gasp!) in my leanings- I'm a registered Independent, and I'm not terribly impressed by the Democrats largely (or Republicans) and vote with my conscience and try to do my research. FWIW, my favorite US president is a Republican (Jackson).
In any event, I figured that something wasn't right about this email, and did a bit of research. Took me all of 5 seconds to Google up some info:
Social Security
English Language
Now, I was taught to never rely on just one source in school, so I didn't take these entries at completely face value (besides they could be run by liberals!!!!). I'm not positive, but Snopes may be one of those Wikipedia like beasts that rely on user input and have little to no editorial control/fact-checking, but it was a start. It provided me with some handy links to something that should be rather reliable- our own US governmental Senate pages.
Anyway, after about 10-15 minutes of research, I sent off a response to my friend:
Editorial- Once more, I've removed lists of voting Senators names. They're linked, for one, if anyone cares, and two, it's not relevant to my point. Which I'm finally getting to.
THE POINT (At last!)
It took me all of 15 - 20 minutes, including gathering my thoughts, typing, and editing, to do all of this research. That's it. Just a few minutes to figure some things out and see that someone was only presenting a skewed version of the "facts" with a very obvious agenda to push. Now, it is certainly a partisan issue, as the actual votes show, but the original email doesn't make nearly clear the grey areas of the actual issues.
The point is, how many people out there get outraged and upset by emails/comments, etc like this (on any side of the issue, any issue) and don't bother to check into things. My friend even pointed out that it might be worth looking into, but I'm sure that most people can't be bothered and just take things on face value, confident that someone else must have done the research and knows what they are talking about.
5 seconds to Google. 10 minutes (maybe) to read over the well documented and hyperlinked pages on the US Senate website (there are even transcripts of the actual sessions linked there to read over if you really want to get the lowdown on who said what/when/why/what they were wearing).
In this information era, there is absolutely no reason for people to not take a few seconds or minutes out of their day to try and get informed about things.
That's how wars get started.
This morning, a friend of mine forwarded me an email that he had received:
Shocking Senatorial Votes
"Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and
beat you with experience." ~ anonymous
The following senators voted against making English the official language of America:
Now, the following are the senators who voted to give illegal aliens Social Security benefits. They are grouped by home state. If a state is not listed, there was no voting representative.
SEND THIS TO ALL YOU KNOW. THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES NEEDS TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION, UNLESS THEY DON'T MIND SHARING THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY WITH FOREIGN WORKERS who didn't pay in a dime.
Editorial here by me: I snipped the list of senators because it just takes up too much space, and is pretty irrelevant to the point of this blog. I will note, however, that the senators listed are almost entirely Democrats, which does tie into the point of this blog somewhat.
In any event, the prominence of all the Democratic senators led me to the immediate assumption that this was some sort of partisan rant by some Republican emailer (probably not even a pol, but just some shmoe at home wanting to stir things up by mass e-mailing everyone he could.)
Now, I was never terribly politically minded until 9/11, like, I imagine, many people in the country. Never even voted until after that (or registered to vote!) Since then, I've found myself somewhat interested in politics and the political process, and I'll freely admit to being rather a liberal (gasp!) in my leanings- I'm a registered Independent, and I'm not terribly impressed by the Democrats largely (or Republicans) and vote with my conscience and try to do my research. FWIW, my favorite US president is a Republican (Jackson).
In any event, I figured that something wasn't right about this email, and did a bit of research. Took me all of 5 seconds to Google up some info:
Social Security
English Language
Now, I was taught to never rely on just one source in school, so I didn't take these entries at completely face value (besides they could be run by liberals!!!!). I'm not positive, but Snopes may be one of those Wikipedia like beasts that rely on user input and have little to no editorial control/fact-checking, but it was a start. It provided me with some handy links to something that should be rather reliable- our own US governmental Senate pages.
Anyway, after about 10-15 minutes of research, I sent off a response to my friend:
Looked into the Social Security thing- from what I can tell, it's a misrepresentation of the actual issue (probably an email sent out by some right wing nut trying to stir up trouble ;)). The Social Security thing was an amendment to a larger bill that was supposed to be a comprehensive border/immigration issue. The vote was actually a vote to table the motion to amend, and not a vote in favor/against of the motion itself. You can read more about it here.
The actual vote, with tallies of who voted for/against what, and what the issue was (as well as links to the text of the discussion and the bill and proposed amendments is available from our very own government, here: Social Security vote)
Same thing with the English Language thing, almost. There were two amendments that were voted on, that were somewhat contradictory. *Both* amendments were intended to recognize English as the official language of the United States (a correction I make to the email writers notion of "America"- we are not America, we are but one of the Americas).
The first is the one your email cites- amendment 4064, which wanted to recognize English and wanted to make certain that "no person has a right, entitlement, or claim to have the Government of the United States or any of its officials or representatives act, communicate, perform or provide services, or provide materials in any language other than English." In other words, people couldn't expect that, say, schools might provide instructional materials to assist their Spanish-speaking and raised children to assist them in better learning, say, English. The same would apply to *legal* non-English speaking residents/immigrants, of any non-US country.
Now, it's arguable that anyone in the US should have any rights or expectations that anyone would attempt to accomodate their language, though it's certainly a jingoistic view that isn't really shared in many places in the world (such as the European countries), but this amendment would have provided a legal recourse for, essentially, discrimination based on language.
In any event, here's how the vote actually played out in the Senate:
4064 vote
Now, amendment 4073 was essentially the same thing, but instead of placing restrictions, this is what its purpose was: "The Government of the United States shall preserve and enhance the role of English as the common and unifying language of America. Nothing herein shall diminish or expand any existing rights under the law of the United States relative to services or materials provided by the government of the United States in any language other than English."
Still recognizing English as the language of the US (and I just noted that the amendment itself refers to it as America, and not the US- ugh.), still recognizing the language, but not providing any prohibitions on how the recognition of other languages might be performed. If nothing else, it could be perceived by the more cynical among us (myself) as a means of preventing a bunch more frivolous lawsuits in our overly litigious society whereby someone (under the first proposed amendment) might decide to sue a teacher who was speaking spanish to her spanish-speaking kids in class, and english to her english-speaking kids, in an effort to teach both.
4073 vote
Interestingly, 12 Republicans voted in favor of both amendments, while no Democrats voted against 4074 (as opposed to 4073, which was was more split). So it does seem to have been a partisan issue.
Also, the same three voters declined to vote in both issues:
(Those three were erroneously counted in the emails assertion that "38" voted against making English the "official language").
Now, since both votes on both amendments passed, I'm currently unclear as to exactly where that leaves things- still researching that. For all I know, the larger bill never was signed into law in the first place, making the issue sort of moot. If so, then both amendments are contradictory, so again, not sure what that means.
Anyway, just some further research on the topic to mull over.
Editorial- Once more, I've removed lists of voting Senators names. They're linked, for one, if anyone cares, and two, it's not relevant to my point. Which I'm finally getting to.
THE POINT (At last!)
It took me all of 15 - 20 minutes, including gathering my thoughts, typing, and editing, to do all of this research. That's it. Just a few minutes to figure some things out and see that someone was only presenting a skewed version of the "facts" with a very obvious agenda to push. Now, it is certainly a partisan issue, as the actual votes show, but the original email doesn't make nearly clear the grey areas of the actual issues.
The point is, how many people out there get outraged and upset by emails/comments, etc like this (on any side of the issue, any issue) and don't bother to check into things. My friend even pointed out that it might be worth looking into, but I'm sure that most people can't be bothered and just take things on face value, confident that someone else must have done the research and knows what they are talking about.
5 seconds to Google. 10 minutes (maybe) to read over the well documented and hyperlinked pages on the US Senate website (there are even transcripts of the actual sessions linked there to read over if you really want to get the lowdown on who said what/when/why/what they were wearing).
In this information era, there is absolutely no reason for people to not take a few seconds or minutes out of their day to try and get informed about things.
That's how wars get started.
Friday, December 15, 2006
Friday, December 08, 2006
Been a while, I know
Yes, it's been quite a while since my last blog. Maybe I'll try and keep this thing more up to date.
In the meantime, who says the increasing violence in video games isn't a problem:
Wii Have a Problem
In the meantime, who says the increasing violence in video games isn't a problem:
Wii Have a Problem
Monday, July 10, 2006
Napoleon's Pet
From the files of Things I Learned in Movies That I Never Thought Would Be True:
"It's pretty much my favorite animal.
"It's pretty much my favorite animal.
Daily Affirmations
Sort of fitting, I suppose, that since my last blog was about Credit Card Fraud, that this one should be about the fraud that I often feel like. I constantly feel like I am not as good as people tell me I am, that I cannot possibly live up to their (or my own) expectations. Today that phenomenon hit a real note with me, as I dropped the ball on the new student orientation at my school. The students were all taken care of, and got the essentials out of everything that they needed, but there were a lot of little details along the way that I could have, or felt I should have, taken care of to smooth things out. A few details, but when added all together they made a real mess, at least to my perception and (from the frustrated reactions of coworkers) others as well.
I've felt for months now, ever since I took this new position, that I am a fraud, that I got the position not by merit, but by luck, or by fooling others into believing that I am more capable than I am. I mentioned this to my dad this evening, and he pointed out that the feeling is common, and that it is well documented. Sure enough, the phenomenon is fairly well documented, and is known as "Impostor Syndrome" or "Impostor Phenomenon." Only a few short weeks ago, a friend of mine pointed out the symptoms to me, and finally, thanks to my dad, I was able to put a name to the symptoms that I've been struggling with for, literally, years.
Sad to say that there doesn't seem to be any quick fix from those who have identified the phenomenon- a very modern (American?) hope. In any case, I hope that I can finally begin to wrestle with and overcome it, maybe to be the success that I know I can, if I would only allow myself to be.
"I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and gosh darn it, people like me." - Stuart Smalley
For more information on Impostor Syndrome, check out these sites:
http://www.impostersyndrome.com/
http://www.counseling.caltech.edu/articles/The%20Imposter%20Syndrome.htm
http://talentdevelop.com/impostor.html
I've felt for months now, ever since I took this new position, that I am a fraud, that I got the position not by merit, but by luck, or by fooling others into believing that I am more capable than I am. I mentioned this to my dad this evening, and he pointed out that the feeling is common, and that it is well documented. Sure enough, the phenomenon is fairly well documented, and is known as "Impostor Syndrome" or "Impostor Phenomenon." Only a few short weeks ago, a friend of mine pointed out the symptoms to me, and finally, thanks to my dad, I was able to put a name to the symptoms that I've been struggling with for, literally, years.
Sad to say that there doesn't seem to be any quick fix from those who have identified the phenomenon- a very modern (American?) hope. In any case, I hope that I can finally begin to wrestle with and overcome it, maybe to be the success that I know I can, if I would only allow myself to be.
"I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and gosh darn it, people like me." - Stuart Smalley
For more information on Impostor Syndrome, check out these sites:
http://www.impostersyndrome.com/
http://www.counseling.caltech.edu/articles/The%20Imposter%20Syndrome.htm
http://talentdevelop.com/impostor.html
Saturday, July 01, 2006
Credit Card Fraud
My first experience with online credit card fraud happened today.
When doing my monthly bill paying/checkbook balance ritual, I noticed a couple of charges for $9.95 from two online companies I've never heard of- Moball LLC and U-Webtemplate.com
Now, I do use my credit card online from time to time- most notably with a recent surge of Ebay purchases a couple of months ago- and I'm pretty aware of the transactions. I keep all records of them in my email, so I can go back and double check a charge if I'm unsure of where it came from.
No record of these companies, and just the names sounded off (in particular, the U-Webtemplate one- I do my own html programming, and use Eversoft Firstpage- freeware- for my web design, so I know I've never made a purchase for any sort of web template.)
I did a little bit of research online, and found a couple of places where other people had been victims of fraudulent charges by these two companies. Most notably, at Robert K. Brown's blog. A quick look over that blog shows that many, many people have been the victims of this fraud.
Sadly, outside of blogs, no one in the mainstream media seems to have taken any notice of this, or cared enough to report it. From a lot of the posts, it doesn't even seem like the credit card companies are all that concerned about it themselves.
Anyway, long story short, I called my bank, cancelled my card, and filed a fraud charge with them. Hopefully that will take care of things.
In any case, I hope the awareness of these fraudulent companies will be raised, and hope that this blog will help a little bit. Be careful!
Some links:
A Work In Progress: U-Webtemplate
A Work In Progress: Digital Age Update
Credit Card Fraud Security
Internet Crime Complaint Center
When doing my monthly bill paying/checkbook balance ritual, I noticed a couple of charges for $9.95 from two online companies I've never heard of- Moball LLC and U-Webtemplate.com
Now, I do use my credit card online from time to time- most notably with a recent surge of Ebay purchases a couple of months ago- and I'm pretty aware of the transactions. I keep all records of them in my email, so I can go back and double check a charge if I'm unsure of where it came from.
No record of these companies, and just the names sounded off (in particular, the U-Webtemplate one- I do my own html programming, and use Eversoft Firstpage- freeware- for my web design, so I know I've never made a purchase for any sort of web template.)
I did a little bit of research online, and found a couple of places where other people had been victims of fraudulent charges by these two companies. Most notably, at Robert K. Brown's blog. A quick look over that blog shows that many, many people have been the victims of this fraud.
Sadly, outside of blogs, no one in the mainstream media seems to have taken any notice of this, or cared enough to report it. From a lot of the posts, it doesn't even seem like the credit card companies are all that concerned about it themselves.
Anyway, long story short, I called my bank, cancelled my card, and filed a fraud charge with them. Hopefully that will take care of things.
In any case, I hope the awareness of these fraudulent companies will be raised, and hope that this blog will help a little bit. Be careful!
Some links:
A Work In Progress: U-Webtemplate
A Work In Progress: Digital Age Update
Credit Card Fraud Security
Internet Crime Complaint Center
Thursday, June 29, 2006
Dial "S" for Smell
Alternative title for this blog: Smell My Cell
From Mobile media:
Wow- as if I needed another reason not to get a cell phone. Now people have to worry about their practical joker buddies swapping out their perfumed cartridges with the inevitable "joke fart smell" cartridges that will come out via third party vendors.
Although it does provide people with chronic gas problems an out to cover up their physical dilemma.
"Hey, Joe, did you just let one rip?"
"Not me, man- it was my cell phone. Excuse me while I take this call."
From Mobile media:
Samsung Develops 'Smell Tones' | ||||
Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:14 pm "Samsung Electronics has developed a perfume spraying cell phone to release "smell tones" when incoming calls are received.
The invention uses a pressurized heating chamber to store one or more scents. Using an ultrasonic controller triggered by the press of a button or an incoming call, perfume is excited and released into the air. However practicality may hinder its integration and eventual product release. The spray unit adds considerable bulk, contrary to slimmer and smaller market trends. "It may be difficult to embed a perfume spraying apparatus in a small and lightweight mobile phone," the application states. And more fundamentally, "the perfume may stain the mobile phone or the user's clothes." Mobile multimedia has grown to become a $9.1 billion industry. With ringtones and more recently ringback tones projected at making up 12% of total music sales by 2008, consumers continue to look for new customizations. And Samsung is hard at work to find new ways to differentiate mobile phones." |
Wow- as if I needed another reason not to get a cell phone. Now people have to worry about their practical joker buddies swapping out their perfumed cartridges with the inevitable "joke fart smell" cartridges that will come out via third party vendors.
Although it does provide people with chronic gas problems an out to cover up their physical dilemma.
"Hey, Joe, did you just let one rip?"
"Not me, man- it was my cell phone. Excuse me while I take this call."
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Is he strong? Listen, bub...
Spider-Man 3 trailer is up at Sony's website:
Trailer
It looks pretty cool. I never quite got the whole "Venom" thing, though. The whole appeal of that character. He's, what, an embittered photojournalist in the alien suit that Spider-Man brought back from Battleworld? (Secret Wars reference. Yes, I'm a comic geek.)

In other words, he's just a bulked up, psychotic Peter Parker in black and white with a ridiculously oversized jaw and gigantic tongue who drools all over the place. Big whoop.
(Don't even get me started on the whole "Venom: Lethal Protector" thing from the 90's. Geek.)
Still, it looks like it should be pretty cool, although I fear that they may be going into the Batman Returns "put too many elements into the mixture" bit- I count Sandman, Venom (Parker and Eddie Brock versions), Green/Hobgoblin, and Black Cat (or at least Felicia Hardy, the platinum blonde Pete's dancing with). Overkill? We'll see.
Trailer
It looks pretty cool. I never quite got the whole "Venom" thing, though. The whole appeal of that character. He's, what, an embittered photojournalist in the alien suit that Spider-Man brought back from Battleworld? (Secret Wars reference. Yes, I'm a comic geek.)

In other words, he's just a bulked up, psychotic Peter Parker in black and white with a ridiculously oversized jaw and gigantic tongue who drools all over the place. Big whoop.
(Don't even get me started on the whole "Venom: Lethal Protector" thing from the 90's. Geek.)
Still, it looks like it should be pretty cool, although I fear that they may be going into the Batman Returns "put too many elements into the mixture" bit- I count Sandman, Venom (Parker and Eddie Brock versions), Green/Hobgoblin, and Black Cat (or at least Felicia Hardy, the platinum blonde Pete's dancing with). Overkill? We'll see.
Monday, June 26, 2006
Governmental Efficiency Rant
I've been trying to contact the immigration office all morning, in order to do some investigative work for my job. It took me at least 20 minutes to navigate through the phone options before I could finally find an option that would connect me to, you know, a live person. Then, when I did that, I was informed that the wait would be at least 30 minutes, but a good time to try them might be on Wednesday or Thursday. Then the automated service hung up on me.
Tried again 40 minutes later, and after holding for another 20 minutes, I get through to a person. She begins asking me all sorts of questions that I know are not related to my issue, so I cut her off and ask the real question I need answered. She then informs me that I need to call a different number, since I am a DSO.
Fine. I call that number, and get through to a live operator (once again, about a 20 minute wait). When I get through to her, and describe the problem, she refers me back to the first number. "But I already called them, and they referred me to you," I say. She says she knows, that it isn't the first time that has happened, and that they shouldn't have done that. But I need to talk to the people at the first number.
So that's what, close to two hours of my day gone, and still without an answer to my original question? Geez. I can see where some governmental spending cuts could be made right there.
Tried again 40 minutes later, and after holding for another 20 minutes, I get through to a person. She begins asking me all sorts of questions that I know are not related to my issue, so I cut her off and ask the real question I need answered. She then informs me that I need to call a different number, since I am a DSO.
Fine. I call that number, and get through to a live operator (once again, about a 20 minute wait). When I get through to her, and describe the problem, she refers me back to the first number. "But I already called them, and they referred me to you," I say. She says she knows, that it isn't the first time that has happened, and that they shouldn't have done that. But I need to talk to the people at the first number.
So that's what, close to two hours of my day gone, and still without an answer to my original question? Geez. I can see where some governmental spending cuts could be made right there.
Post the First
Dabbled (ever so briefly) with blogging a couple of years ago, but something in me decided it's time to give this a real shot. Not that I have anything particularly noteworthy to say, I guess, but I'm hopeful that it will help me to focus my thoughts a bit. Anyway.
That's the first one. Yippee!
That's the first one. Yippee!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)